India's relationship with semiconductor manufacturing is one of strategic aspiration meeting practical reality. The first semiconductor mission (ISM 1.0, 2021) set ambitious goals but progress was measured and cautious. ISM 2.0 represents a recalibrated approach — more focused, with clearer timelines, identified partners, and a budget that reflects the genuine cost of building semiconductor capability.
What ISM 2.0 Changes
The refined mission addresses several gaps from the initial effort:
Focus on packaging and testing. Rather than pursuing leading-edge chip fabrication immediately (which requires tens of billions of dollars and decades of accumulated expertise), ISM 2.0 emphasizes ATMP (Assembly, Test, Marking, and Packaging) — the back-end of the semiconductor supply chain where India can build competitive capability more quickly. Micron's Sanand facility is the first major ATMP investment.
Compound semiconductors. Silicon chips dominate computing, but compound semiconductors (gallium nitride, silicon carbide) are increasingly important for electric vehicles, 5G infrastructure, renewable energy systems, and defense electronics. India's strategy to develop compound semiconductor manufacturing capacity is strategically astute — the market is growing rapidly, the manufacturing is less capital-intensive than leading-edge silicon, and India can potentially be competitive from the start rather than catching up.
Design ecosystem support. India's existing strength in chip design is being leveraged more deliberately. Initiatives to support fabless semiconductor companies (companies that design chips but contract manufacturing to foundries) capitalize on India's engineering talent while the manufacturing capability is being built separately.
The Talent Pipeline
Semiconductor manufacturing requires specialized skills that India's current engineering education doesn't adequately provide. ISM 2.0 includes provisions for establishing semiconductor training programs at IITs and engineering colleges, and partnerships with established semiconductor companies for on-the-job training.
The talent challenge is real but addressable. India produced semiconductor design talent for global companies for decades — the adjustment is building manufacturing talent alongside. Programs at IIT Bombay, IISc Bangalore, and BITS Pilani are developing specialized curricula, and the establishment of semiconductor fabrication labs at these institutions provides hands-on training that theory-only education cannot.
International Partnerships
ISM 2.0 reflects a clearer understanding that no country builds semiconductor capability alone. Partnerships with Japan (for compound semiconductors and equipment), Taiwan (through PSMC's joint venture with Tata), the US (through bilateral agreements on semiconductor supply chain cooperation), and the EU (through the India-EU Trade and Technology Council) provide technology access, knowledge transfer, and investment that domestic effort alone cannot generate.
The geopolitical context helps India. The global desire to diversify semiconductor manufacturing away from Taiwan (which produces over 90% of the world's most advanced chips and faces constant geopolitical risk) creates incentives for established semiconductor companies to support India's ambitions. India isn't building semiconductor capability in isolation — it's building it at a moment when the global industry wants it to succeed.
Realistic Expectations
India will not become a semiconductor manufacturing powerhouse by 2030. The Tata-PSMC fab in Gujarat will produce chips at 28nm — mature technology, not cutting edge. The ATMP facilities will handle packaging, not fabrication. This is the beginning of a multi-decade journey, not the culmination.
But beginning is what matters. South Korea's semiconductor journey started in the 1980s with technology licensing from Micron; forty years later, Samsung is a global leader. Taiwan's semiconductor industry was built from nothing starting in 1987 with TSMC's founding; it now dominates global chip manufacturing. India's starting point in 2025-2026 is the equivalent of their 1980s — early, uncertain, and essential.
Comments (0)
Be the first to share your thoughts on this article.